Giuseppe Nespeca è architetto e sacerdote. Cultore della Sacra scrittura è autore della raccolta "Due Fuochi due Vie - Religione e Fede, Vangeli e Tao"; coautore del libro "Dialogo e Solstizio".
Pentecost Sunday (Year C) [8 June 2025]
May God bless us and the Virgin protect us! On the feast of Pentecost, like Mary and the apostles, let us prepare our hearts to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit who transforms us into fire and light of love. Today, the first reading and the responsorial psalm are common to years A, B, and C, while the second reading and the Gospel are different each year.
*First reading from the Acts of the Apostles (2:1-11)
Jerusalem is not only the city where Jesus instituted the Eucharist, died and rose again, but it is also the city where the Spirit was poured out upon humanity. It was the year of Jesus' death, but the people in the city had probably never heard of his death, let alone his resurrection, so the feast of Pentecost was like any other for them. The Jewish Pentecost was very important because it was the feast of the giving of the Law, one of the three feasts of the year for which people went on pilgrimage to Jerusalem, and the list of all the nationalities present on that occasion proves its great interest. For the disciples of Jesus, who had seen, heard and touched him after his resurrection, nothing was the same as before, even if they did not expect what was about to happen. Luke helps us to understand what is happening by choosing his words carefully and evoking at least these three texts from the Old Testament: the gift of the Law at Sinai, a prophecy of Joel, and the episode of the Tower of Babel. First of all, Sinai. The tongues of fire and the sound like a mighty wind recall what happened at Sinai when God gave the tablets of the Law to Moses (Exodus 19:16-19). Following this line, Luke helps us understand that Pentecost was not simply a traditional pilgrimage, but a new Sinai, where God gave his Law to teach the people how to live in the Covenant. At Pentecost, He gave His own Spirit, and from then on, His Law, the only true path to freedom and happiness, was no longer written on stone tablets but in the hearts of men, as Ezekiel had prophesied (Ezekiel 11:19-20; 36:26-27). The prophet Joel: Luke certainly wanted to evoke a word of Joel: 'I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh, says God' (Joel 3:1), that is, on all humanity. For Luke, those devout Jews from all nations under heaven, as he calls them, are a symbol of the whole of humanity, for whom Joel's prophecy is finally fulfilled, and this means that the long-awaited 'Day of the Lord' has come. The Tower of Babel is an event that can be summarised in two acts: Act 1: Men, who speak the same language and the same words, decide to build an immense tower between the earth and the sky. Act 2: God stops them and scatters them across the earth, confusing their languages, and from that moment on they no longer understand each other. What is the meaning of this story? God certainly does not want to stifle man's potential, and if He intervenes, He does so to spare humanity the false path of single-minded thinking and a human project that excludes God. It is as if He were saying: you are seeking unity, which is a good thing, but you are going about it the wrong way, because unity in love does not come through standardisation, but through diversity. And this is the message of Pentecost: at Babel, humanity learns diversity; at Pentecost, it learns unity in diversity, 'conviviality' (as Don Tonino Bello writes), because all nations hear the proclamation, each in its own language, of the one message: 'Magnalia Dei, the great works of God' (Acts 2:11).
*Responsorial Psalm (103 (104), 1.24, 29-30, 31.34)
This psalm has 36 verses of praise and wonder at the works of God, a beautiful poem. It is proposed for the feast of Pentecost because Luke, in the book of the Acts of the Apostles, recounts that on the morning of Pentecost, the apostles, filled with the Holy Spirit, began to proclaim in all languages the 'great works of God' of creation. All civilisations have poems about the beauty of nature. In particular, a poem written by the famous pharaoh Akhenaten (Amenhotep IV) was found in Egypt in the tomb of a pharaoh, a hymn to the Sun God. Amenhotep IV lived around 1350 BC, at a time when the Jews were probably in Egypt and may have known this poem. There are similarities in style and vocabulary between the pharaoh's poem and Psalm 103/104, but what is interesting is to note the differences marked by God's revelation to the people of the Covenant. First difference: God alone is God, an essential difference for the faith of Israel: God is the only God, there are no others, and the sun is not a god. The account of creation in the book of Genesis puts the sun and moon in their place: they are not gods, but luminaries, themselves simple creatures. Several verses show God as the only Lord of creation using royal language: God presents himself as a magnificent, majestic and victorious king. Second peculiarity: Creation is all good, and here there is an echo of Genesis, which repeats tirelessly: 'And God saw that it was good'. This psalm evokes all the elements of creation with the same wonder: 'I rejoice in the Lord', and the psalmist adds (in a verse not read this Sunday): 'I will sing to the Lord as long as I live, I will sing praise to my God while I have my breath'. However, evil is not ignored: the end of the psalm mentions it and invokes its disappearance, since it was already understood in the Old Testament that evil does not come from God, because all creation is good and one day God will remove all evil from the earth: the victorious King will eliminate everything that hinders human happiness. Third peculiarity: Creation is continuous, not an act of the past, as if God had thrown the earth and man into space once and for all, but a perennial relationship between the Creator and his creatures. When we say in the Creed: "I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth," we are not only affirming our faith in an initial act, but we are recognising that we are in a necessary relationship with him, and this psalm reiterates this by speaking of God's constant action: "All wait for you... You hide your face, they are dismayed... You take away their breath, they die and return to their dust. You send forth your spirit, they are created, and you renew the face of the earth." Another peculiarity: Man is the culmination of creation. According to the Jewish faith, man is at the summit of creation, the king of creation, and for this reason he is filled with the breath of God. And this is precisely what we celebrate at Pentecost: the Spirit of God who is in us vibrates and resonates with man and with all creation, and the psalmist sings: 'Let God rejoice in his works! I rejoice in the Lord." In conclusion, creation makes sense in the light of the Covenant: In Israel, every reflection on creation is placed in the perspective of the Covenant, since Israel first experienced liberation by God and only afterwards meditated on creation in the light of this fundamental experience. There are visible traces of this in the psalm: First of all, the name of God used is always the famous tetragrammaton YHWH, which we translate as Lord, the name of the God of the Covenant, revealed to Moses. Furthermore, in the expression, 'Lord, my God, how great you are', the possessive is a reference to the Covenant, since God's plan in the Covenant was precisely this: 'You shall be my people, and I will be your God'. This promise is fulfilled in the gift of the Spirit to all flesh, as the prophet Joel proclaims, and every person is invited to receive the gift of the Spirit to become a true child of God.
*Second Reading from the Letter of Saint Paul the Apostle to the Romans (8:8–17)
The main difficulty in this text lies in the word 'flesh', which in St Paul's vocabulary does not have the same meaning as in our vocabulary, where the two components of the human being, body and soul, are often contrasted, with the risk of misinterpreting what Paul means when he speaks of flesh and Spirit. What he calls 'flesh' is not what we call body, and what he calls 'Spirit' does not correspond to what we call soul; indeed, he specifies several times that it is the Spirit of God, 'the Spirit of Christ'. He does not contrast two words, 'flesh' and 'Spirit', but two expressions: 'living according to the flesh' and 'living according to the Spirit', that is, choosing between two ways of living, or rather deciding whom to follow and what course of action to take. Here we return to the theme of the two paths that every Jew, like St Paul, knows well: choosing between two paths, between two possible attitudes in the face of difficulties or trials: trust in God or distrust; the certainty of never feeling abandoned by God or the doubt and suspicion that God does not really seek our good; fidelity to his commandments because we trust him, or disobedience because we consider ourselves capable of autonomous decisions. The history of Israel in the Bible (think of Massah and Meribah in the Book of Exodus) presents numerous examples of mistrust in the face of life's trials, especially in the desert, where the people faced many trials, including hunger and thirst. When the people suspected that God had abandoned them, they put God and Moses on trial. Even Adam, faced with the limits placed on his desires, suspected and disobeyed the Lord. The temptation of Adam and Eve in Eden is repeated in our lives every day: it is the constant problem of trust and distrust, the so-called 'original' sin in the sense that it is at the root of all human disasters. Opposed to suspicion and rebellion against God is Christ's attitude of trust and submission because he knows that God's will is only good. Especially in the face of the challenges of pain in all its forms and death, there are two opposing attitudes that Paul calls 'living according to the flesh' or 'living according to the Spirit'. For him, living according to the flesh means behaving like slaves who do not trust and obey out of obligation or fear of punishment. "Living according to the Spirit," on the other hand, means "behaving like children," that is, weaving relationships of trust and tenderness which, following Christ's example, lead to life. Living under the influence of the flesh (i.e., in an attitude of distrust and disobedience towards God) leads to death, while living through the Spirit is to put to death the works of sin. In other words, the attitude of a slave is destructive, while the attitude of a child is the way to peace and happiness. The Spirit of God, who dwells in us through baptism, enables us to call God 'Abba-Father', and on the day when all humanity recognises God as Father, the divine plan will be fulfilled, and we will all enter into his glory together. A few verses later, Paul notes that creation eagerly awaits the revelation of the children of God. Finally, today's text reminds us that since we are children of God, we are also heirs of God, co-heirs with Christ, on condition that we suffer with him in order to be with him in glory. This text can be read in two ways: the slave imagines a God who sets conditions on inheritance; instead, the son considers God as Father even and above all in suffering. Suffering is inevitable, as it was for Christ, but lived with him and like him, it becomes a path to resurrection, and then 'on condition that we suffer with him' means: on condition that we are with him, that we remain united to him at all times, even in inevitable suffering.
*From the Gospel according to John (14:15-16, 23b-26)
This well-known Gospel passage takes on new meaning today thanks to the other biblical texts proposed for the feast of Pentecost. For example, we are tempted to think of the Holy Spirit in terms of inspiration, ideas, discernment, intelligence, but for the feast of the gift of the Spirit, today's Gospel speaks only of love. Jesus says here that the Spirit of God is something else entirely: it is Love, Love personified. This means that on the morning of Pentecost in Jerusalem, when the disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit, it was love itself, which is God, that filled them. In the same way, we too, baptised and confirmed, know that our capacity to love is inhabited by the love of God himself. The responsorial psalm 103/104 reminds us of this when it proclaims: You send forth your Spirit, and we, created in the image of God, are called to resemble him more and more, constantly moulded by him in his image. The Spirit is the potter who works his clay, and every vessel becomes more and more refined in the hands of the craftsman. We are the clay in God's hands, so our likeness to Him is refined more and more as we allow ourselves to be transformed by the Spirit of Love. In the second reading, St. Paul speaks of our relationship with God, summarising it in one sentence: we are no longer slaves, but children of God, while in the Gospel, Jesus links our relationship with God to our relationship with our brothers and sisters: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments" (Jn 14:15), and we know well what his commandment is: 'that you love one another as I have loved you' (Jn 13:34). If Jesus is referring to the gesture of washing feet, that is, to a decisive attitude of service, we can translate "if you love me, you will keep my commandments" as "if you love me, you will serve one another". God's love and love for our brothers and sisters are inseparable, so inseparable that it is by the quality of our service to our neighbour that the quality of our love for God is judged and therefore "if you do not serve your brothers and sisters, do not claim to love me!" A little further on, Jesus takes up a similar expression and develops it: "If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him" (Jn 14:23). This does not mean that the Father in heaven does not love us if we do not serve our brothers and sisters, because there are no conditions or blackmail in him. On the contrary, the characteristic of mercy is precisely to bend down even more towards the poor, as we are all poor, at least in terms of love and service to others. Love is learned by practising it, but what the Lord is telling us here is something we know well: the ability to love is an art, and every art is learned by practising it. The Father's love is boundless, infinite, but our capacity to receive it is limited and grows as we practise it. We can therefore translate this as follows: 'If anyone loves me, he will put himself at the service of others and little by little, his heart will expand; the love of God will fill him more and more, and he will be able to serve others even better... and so on to infinity," that is, in unlimited progress. Let us conclude by returning to the term "Paraclete," which can be translated as comforter and defender. Yes, we need a defender, but not before God, and St. Paul makes this clear in the second reading: The Spirit you have received does not make you slaves, people who are still afraid, but rather the Spirit who makes you children (cf. Rom 8:15). We are therefore no longer afraid of God and we do not need a lawyer before Him. But then why does Jesus say that he will pray to the Father, and he will give us another defender, to remain with us forever? Yes, we need an advocate, who defends us from ourselves, from our reluctance to serve others, from our lack of trust in God's power, who constantly defends the cause of others against our selfishness because, in doing so, he actually defends us, since true happiness consists in allowing ourselves to be moulded every day by God in his image, overcoming all selfish resistance.
+Giovanni D'Ercole
(Mt 5:20-26)
«I tell you in fact that unless your righteousness will abound more [that] of the scribes and pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven»
In the churches of Galilee and Syria there were different and conflicting opinions about the Law of Moses: for some an absolute to be fulfilled even in detail, for others now a meaningless frill (v.22).
The disputants went so far as to insult, to ridicule the opposing party.
But as the Tao Tê Ching (xxx) says: «Where the militias are stationed, thorns and brambles are born». Master Wang Pi comments: «He who promotes himself causes unrest, because he strives to affirm his merits».
Mt helps all community sisters and brothers to understand the content of the ancient Scriptures and grasp the attitude of ‘continuity and cut’ given by the Lord: «You have heard that [...] Now I say to you» (vv.21-22).
‘Arrow’ of the ancient codes was shot in the right direction, but only understanding its range in the spirit of concordance sustains trajectory to the point of providing the energy needed to hit the “target”.
Ideal of ancient religiosity was to present oneself pure before God, and in this sense the Scribes official theologians of the Sanhedrin emphasised the value of the rules that they believed were nestled in the First Testament ‘prison of the letter’.
Sadducees - the priestly class - focused on the sacrificial observances of the Torah alone.
Pharisees, leaders of popular religiosity, emphasised the respect for all traditional customs.
Teaching of professionals of the sacred produced in the people a sense of legalistic oppression that obscured the spirit of the Word of God and of Tradition itself.
Jesus brings out the goal: the greater Justice of Love.
The splendor, beauty and richness of the Glory of the living God is not produced in observing, but in the ability to manifest Him Present.
The right position before Father becomes - in Jesus' proposal - the right position before one's own history and that of one’s neighbor.
First «debt» is therefore a ‘global understanding’: here the Eternal is revealed.
Justice is not the product of the accumulation of righteous deeds, in view of merit: this would manifest narrowness, detachment and arrogance (a type of man of unquestioning thought).
The new Justice chases complicity with evil up to the secret roots of the heart and ideas. But not to accentuate the sense of guilt, nor to make us pursues external dreams.
Observance that does not abide in friendship, in tolerance even of oneself, in Christ who orients, would arise from an ambiguous relationship with the norm and doctrines.
We can overlook the childish need for approval.
The Life of God transpires in a world not of sterilised or pure and phlegmatic one-sided people, but in a conviviality of differences that resembles Him.
To internalize and live the message:
Where do you find the emotional nourishment you need?
What do you think of exclusive groups and their idea of the ultimate court?
[Thursday 10th wk. in O.T. June 12, 2025]
(Mt 5:20-26)
«I tell you in fact that unless your righteousness will abound more [that] of the scribes and pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven»
In the churches of Galilee and Syria there were different and conflicting opinions about the Law of Moses: for some an absolute to be fulfilled even in detail, for others now a meaningless frill (v.22).
The disputants went so far as to insult, to ridicule the opposing party.
But as the Tao Tê Ching (xxx) says: «Where the militias are stationed, thorns and brambles are born». Master Wang Pi comments: «He who promotes himself causes unrest, because he strives to affirm his merits».
Mt helps all community sisters and brothers to understand the content of the ancient Scriptures and grasp the attitude of ‘continuity and cut’ given by the Lord: «You have heard that [...] Now I say to you» (vv.21-22).
‘Arrow’ of the ancient codes was shot in the right direction, but only understanding its range in the spirit of concordance sustains trajectory to the point of providing the energy needed to hit the “target”.
Ideal of ancient religiosity was to present oneself pure before God, and in this sense the Scribes official theologians of the Sanhedrin emphasised the value of the rules that they believed were nestled in the First Testament ‘prison of the letter’.
Sadducees - the priestly class - focused on the sacrificial observances of the Torah alone.
Pharisees, leaders of popular religiosity, emphasised the respect for all traditional customs.
Teaching of professionals of the sacred produced in the people a sense of legalistic oppression that obscured the spirit of the Word of God and of Tradition itself.
Jesus brings out the goal: the greater Justice of Love.
The splendor, beauty and richness of the Glory of the living God is not produced in observing, but in the ability to manifest Him Present.
The right position before Father becomes - in Jesus' proposal - the right position before one's own history and that of one’s neighbor.
First «debt» is therefore a ‘global understanding’: here the Eternal is revealed.
Justice is not the product of the accumulation of righteous deeds, in view of merit: this would manifest narrowness, detachment and arrogance (a type of man of unquestioning thought).
The new Justice chases complicity with evil up to the secret roots of the heart and ideas. But not to accentuate the sense of guilt, nor to make us pursues external dreams.
Observance that does not abide in friendship, in tolerance even of oneself, in Christ who orients, would arise from an ambiguous relationship with the norm and doctrines.
We can overlook the childish need for approval.
The Life of God transpires in a world not of sterilised or pure and phlegmatic one-sided people, but in a conviviality of differences that resembles Him.
To internalize and live the message:
Where do you find the emotional nourishment you need?
What do you think of exclusive groups and their idea of the ultimate court?
Discord even with creation
If man is not reconciled with God, he is also in discord with creation. He is not reconciled with himself, he would like to be something other than what he is and is therefore not reconciled with his neighbour either. Also part of reconciliation is the ability to acknowledge guilt and ask for forgiveness - from God and from each other. And finally, part of the process of reconciliation is the readiness to do penance, the readiness to suffer to the end for a fault and allow oneself to be transformed. And part of it is that gratuitousness of which the Encyclical 'Caritas in veritate' speaks repeatedly: the readiness to go beyond what is necessary, to go beyond reckoning, but to go beyond what mere legal conditions require. This includes that generosity of which God himself has given us an example. Let us think of Jesus' words: 'If you present your offering at the altar and there you remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar, go first and be reconciled with your brother, and then come back and offer your gift' (Mt 5:23f.). God, who knew that we are not reconciled, who saw that we have something against Him, rose up and came to meet us, even though He alone was on the side of reason. He came to meet us up to the cross, to reconcile us. This is gratuitousness: the readiness to take the first step. To first go out to meet the other, to offer him reconciliation, to take on the suffering that entails giving up one's own right. Do not give in to the desire for reconciliation: God has given us an example of this, and this is the way to become like Him, an attitude we need again and again in the world. We must today relearn the ability to recognise guilt, we must shake off the illusion that we are innocent. We must learn the capacity to do penance, to let ourselves be transformed; to go out to meet the other and to let God give us the courage and the strength for such a renewal.
[Pope Benedict, Address to the Roman Curia 21 December 2009].
Jesus' attitude with respect to the Jewish Law: deep motivation, hidden wisdom. Precept - demand of love
The Gospel [...] is still part of the so-called 'Sermon on the Mount', the first great preaching of Jesus. Today the theme is Jesus' attitude towards the Jewish Law. He states: 'Do not believe that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish, but to fulfil' (Mt 5:17). Jesus therefore does not want to cancel the commandments that the Lord gave through Moses, but wants to bring them to their fullness. And immediately afterwards he adds that this "fulfilment" of the Law requires a higher justice, a more authentic observance. For he says to his disciples: "Unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven" (Mt 5:20).
But what does this "full fulfilment" of the Law mean? And in what does this superior justice consist? Jesus himself answers us with some examples. Jesus was practical, he always spoke with examples to make himself understood. He starts from the fifth commandment of the Decalogue: "You have heard that it was said to the ancients, 'You shall not kill'; ... But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother shall be subject to judgment" (vv. 21-22). With this, Jesus reminds us that even words can kill! When you say of a person that he has a serpent's tongue, what do you mean? That his words kill! Therefore, not only must one not attempt the life of one's neighbour, but neither should one pour the poison of wrath upon him and strike him with slander. Not even gossip about him. We come to chatter: chatter, too, can kill, because it kills people's reputation! It is so bad to talk! At first it may seem like a pleasant, even amusing thing, like sucking a candy. But in the end, it fills our hearts with bitterness, and it also poisons us. I tell you the truth, I am convinced that if everyone made the resolution to avoid gossip, he would eventually become a saint! That's a good way! Do we want to become saints? Yes or no? [Piazza: Yes!] Do we want to live attached to chatter as a habit? Yes or no? [Piazza: No!] Then we agree: no chatter! Jesus proposes to those who follow him the perfection of love: a love whose only measure is to have no measure, to go beyond all calculation. Love of neighbour is such a fundamental attitude that Jesus goes so far as to say that our relationship with God cannot be sincere if we do not want to make peace with our neighbour. And he says: "If therefore you present your offering at the altar and there you remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar, go first and be reconciled with your brother" (vv. 23-24). Therefore we are called to be reconciled with our brothers before we manifest our devotion to the Lord in prayer.
It is clear from all this that Jesus does not simply attach importance to disciplinary observance and outward conduct. He goes to the root of the Law, focusing above all on the intention and therefore on the human heart, from where our good or evil actions originate. Good and honest behaviour requires not just legal rules, but deep motivations, the expression of a hidden wisdom, the Wisdom of God, which can be received through the Holy Spirit. And we, through faith in Christ, can open ourselves to the action of the Spirit, who enables us to experience divine love.
In the light of this teaching, each precept reveals its full meaning as a requirement of love, and all are reunited in the greatest commandment: love God with all your heart and love your neighbour as yourself.
[Pope Francis, Angelus 16 February 2014]
In this [...] Liturgy we continue to read Jesus’ so-called “Sermon on the Mount”. It is contained in chapters 5, 6 and 7 of Matthew’s Gospel. After the Beatitudes, which are the programme of his life, Jesus proclaims the new Law, his Torah, as our Jewish brothers and sisters call it. In fact, on his coming, the Messiah was also to bring the definitive revelation of the Law and this is precisely what Jesus declares: “Think not that I have come to abolish the Law and the Prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them”.
And addressing his disciples, he adds: “unless your righteousness exceeds that of the Scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven” (Mt 5:17,20). But what do this “fullness” of Christ’s Law and this “superior” justice that he demands consist in?
Jesus explains it with a series of antitheses between the old commandments and his new way of propounding them. He begins each time: “You have heard that it was said to the men of old…”, and then he asserts: “but I say to you”…. For example, “You have heard that it was said to the men of old, ‘you shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgement’. But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgement” (Mt 5:21-22).
And he does this six times. This manner of speaking made a great impression on the people, who were shocked, because those words: “I say to you” were equivalent to claiming the actual authority of God, the source of the Law. The newness of Jesus consists essentially in the fact that he himself “fulfils” the commandments with the love of God, with the power of the Holy Spirit who dwells within him. And we, through faith in Christ, can open ourselves to the action of the Holy Spirit who makes us capable of living divine love.
So it is that every precept becomes true as a requirement of love, and all join in a single commandment: love God with all your heart and love your neighbour as yourself. “Love is the fulfilling of the Law”, St Paul writes (Rom 13:10).
With regard to this requirement, for example, the pitiful case of the four Rom children, who died last week when their shack caught fire on the outskirts of this city, forces us to ask ourselves whether a more supportive and fraternal society, more consistent in love, in other words more Christian, might not have been able to prevent this tragic event. And this question applies in the case of so many other grievous events, more or less known, which occur daily in our cities and our towns.
Dear friends, perhaps it is not by chance that Jesus’ first great preaching is called the “Sermon on the Mount”! Moses went up Mount Sinai to receive the Law of God and bring it to the Chosen People. Jesus is the Son of God himself who came down from Heaven to lead us to Heaven, to God’s height, on the way of love. Indeed, he himself is this way; all we have to do in order to put into practice God’s will and to enter his Kingdom, eternal life, is to follow him.
Only one creature has already scaled the mountain peak: the Virgin Mary. Through her union with Jesus, her righteousness was perfect: for this reason we invoke her as Speculum iustitiae. Let us entrust ourselves to her so that she may guide our steps in fidelity to Christ’s Law.
[Pope Benedict, Angelus 13 February 2011]
7. In his activity as a teacher, which began in Nazareth and extended to Galilee and Judea up to the capital, Jerusalem, Jesus knows how to grasp and make the most of the abundant fruits present in the religious tradition of Israel. He penetrates it with a new intelligence, brings out its vital values, highlights its prophetic perspectives. He does not hesitate to denounce men's deviations from the designs of the God of the covenant.
In this way he works, within the one and the same divine revelation, the passage from the "old" to the "new", without abolishing the Law, but instead bringing it to its full fulfilment (cf. Mt 5:17). This is the thought with which the Letter to the Hebrews opens: "God, who had already spoken in ancient times many times and in various ways to the fathers through the prophets, has lately, in these days, spoken to us through his Son . . ." (Heb 1:1).
8. This transition from the 'old' to the 'new' characterises the entire teaching of the 'Prophet' of Nazareth. A particularly clear example is the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew. Jesus says: "You have heard that it was said to the ancients: Do not kill . . . But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother will be brought into judgment" (Matthew 5: 21-22). "Ye have heard that it was said, Thou shalt not commit adultery; but I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her in his heart" (Matt 5:27-28). "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbour and hate your enemy; but I say to you, love your enemies and pray for your persecutors . . ." (Mt 5:43-44).
Teaching in this way, Jesus at the same time declares: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish, but to fulfil" (cf. Mt 5:17).
9. This "fulfil" is a key-word that refers not only to the teaching of the truth revealed by God, but also to the whole history of Israel, that is, of the people whose son Jesus is. This extraordinary history, guided from the beginning by the powerful hand of the God of the covenant, finds its fulfilment in Jesus. The plan that the God of the covenant had inscribed in this history from the beginning, making it the history of salvation, tended towards the "fullness of time" (Gal 4:4), which is fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The Prophet of Nazareth does not hesitate to speak about this from his very first speech in the synagogue of his city.
10. Particularly eloquent are the words of Jesus reported in John's Gospel when he says to his opponents: "Abraham, your father, rejoiced in the hope of seeing my day . . .", and faced with their unbelief: "Are you not yet fifty years old and have you seen Abraham?", Jesus confirms even more explicitly: "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am" (John 8: 56-58). It is evident that Jesus affirms, not only that he is the fulfilment of God's salvific designs, inscribed in the history of Israel since the time of Abraham, but that his existence precedes the time of Abraham, to the point of identifying himself as "he who is" (Ex 3:14). But for this very reason he, Jesus Christ, is the fulfilment of the history of Israel, because he "surpasses" this history with his mystery.
[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 4 February 1987]
It is necessary to live "the petty holiness of negotiation", that is, that "healthy realism" that "the Church teaches us": that is, it is a matter of rejecting the logic of "either this or nothing" and embarking on the path of the "possible" in order to be reconciled with others. Here is the proposal launched by Francis in the Mass celebrated on Thursday morning, 9 June, in the chapel of the Casa Santa Marta. With a small note of tenderness: during the homily a child started to cry but Francis immediately reassured his parents: 'No, let's stay calm, because the sermon of a child in church is more beautiful than that of the priest, than that of the bishop and than that of the Pope. Let it be: let it be, which is the voice of innocence that is good for us all".
For his reflection, the Pope started from the passage in Matthew's Gospel (5:20-26), proposed by the liturgy: "Jesus is in the midst of his people and teaches the disciples, teaches the law of God's people". In fact, "Jesus is that legislator whom Moses promised: 'One shall come after me...'". He is therefore "the true lawgiver, the one who teaches us how the law must be in order to be just". But "the people were a bit bewildered, a bit at a loss, because they did not know what to do and those who taught the law were not consistent". And it is Jesus himself who tells them: "Do what they say, but not what they do". After all, "they were not consistent in their life, they were not a testimony of life". Thus "Jesus, in this Gospel passage, speaks of overcoming: 'Your righteousness must overcome that of the scribes and Pharisees'". Therefore, "to this people somewhat imprisoned in this cage without exit, Jesus shows the way out: it is always to go out, to overcome, to go up".
And in this direction, Francis explained, Jesus 'takes as a first example - he takes many, doesn't he? - the first commandment: love God and love your neighbour: "You have heard that it was said to the ancients, 'You shall not kill', one of the commandments of love of neighbour, 'but I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother shall be subject to judgment. And whoever then says to his brother foolish shall be subjected to the sanhedrin, and whoever says to him insane shall be destined for the fire of Gehenna'".
In essence, Jesus states that "it is a sin not only to kill", but also to "insult and scold" one's brother. And "this is good to hear", the Pope added, precisely "in this time where we are so used to qualifiers and have such a creative vocabulary for insulting others". To offend, therefore, 'is also a sin, it is killing'. Because 'it is giving a slap in the face to the soul of the brother, to the dignity of the brother', to say phrases like: 'pay no attention, this one is a fool, this one is a fool', and 'many other swear words that we say, with much charity, to others'. This, the Pontiff reiterated, "is sin".
Francis noted that "Jesus resolves" the doubts "of this bewildered and imprisoned people by looking up: the law up. And he goes on to connect the conduct of the people with worship to God and says: 'If you go to the altar to give an offering and you have a problem with your brother, or your brother has a problem with you, go to your brother first, be reconciled'". And "this is going beyond the law and what it says is a justice superior to that of the scribes and Pharisees".
"How many times do we in the Church hear these things, how many times!" the Pope noted, recalling that it is not uncommon to hear phrases such as: "But that priest, that man, that woman from Catholic Action, that bishop, that Pope tell us "you must do this!", and he does the opposite". This is precisely "the scandal that wounds the people and does not let God's people grow, that goes forward. It does not free". Also "these people," he continued, "had seen the rigidity of these scribes and Pharisees", so much so that "when a prophet came who gave them some joy they persecuted him and even killed him: there was no place for prophets there".
That is why "Jesus says to the Pharisees: 'You have killed the prophets, you have persecuted the prophets: those who brought the new air'". Jesus, "as he said in the synagogue of Nazareth, came to bring us the year of grace, to bring us liberation, true liberation: that of Jesus". For Francis, 'generosity, holiness is going out but always, always up: going out up'. This 'is liberation from the rigidity of the law and also from idealisms that do us no good'.
"Jesus knows us so well," the Pope explained, "and he knows how we were made because he is the creator, he knows our nature. And here he suggests to us: "If you have a problem with a brother - he says the word 'adversary' - get your act together quickly". Thus the Lord "also teaches us a healthy realism: many times you cannot arrive at perfection, but at least do what you can, agree not to come to judgement". This is the 'healthy realism of the Catholic Church: the Catholic Church never teaches 'either this, or this'". Rather "the Church says: 'this and this'". In short, "be perfect: reconcile with your brother, do not insult him, love him, but if there is any problem at least come to an agreement, so that war does not break out". Here is the 'healthy realism of Catholicism'. Instead "it is not Catholic but it is heretical" to say "it is this or nothing".
"Jesus," Francis assured, "always knows how to walk with us, he gives us the ideal, he accompanies us towards the ideal, he frees us from this caging of the rigidity of the law and tells us: 'Do as much as you can do'. And he understands us well'. This is "this our Lord, this is what he teaches us", telling us: "Please, do not insult yourselves and do not be hypocrites: go and praise God with the same language with which you insult your brother, no, this is not done, but do what you can, at least avoid war among yourselves, come to an agreement". And, the Pope added, "I allow myself to tell you this word that seems a little strange, it is the small holiness of negotiation: I cannot do everything, but I want to do everything, but I agree with you, at least we do not insult each other, we do not make war and we all live in peace".
"Jesus is great," the Pontiff said in conclusion, "and he frees us from all our miseries, even from that idealism that is not Catholic. This is why "we ask the Lord to teach us, first of all, to come out of all rigidity, but to come up, so that we can worship and praise God; that he teach us to reconcile with one another; and also, that he teach us to agree with one another to the point that we can do."
[Pope Francis, S. Marta homily, in L'Osservatore Romano 10/06/2016]
(Mt 5:17-19)
In the face of the Law’s precepts, distant attitudes appear.
There are those who demonstrate attachment to the material sense of what has been established. Others, omission or contempt for the rules.
Jesus offered such a new and radical teaching as to give the impression of carelessness and rejection of the Law. But in fact, more than his differences with it, He was attentive to the profound meaning of the biblical-Jewish directives.
He didn’t intend to «demolish» (v.17) the Torah, but he certainly avoided allowing himself to be minimized in the cases of morality that parceled out the basic choices - and made them all exterior, without fulcrum.
The legalistic sclerotization easily tended to equate the codes... with God. But for the believer, his "obligation" is at the same time Event, Word, and Person: global following.
In the first communities some faithful believed that the norms of the First Testament should no longer be considered, as we are saved by Faith, not by works of Law.
Others accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but couldn’t bear the excess of freedom with which some brothers of the church lived his Presence.
Still linked to an ideal ethnic background, they believed that ancient observance was mandatory.
There was no lack of brothers enraptured by an excess of fantasies in the Spirit. In fact, some denied the Hebrew Scriptures and considered themselves free from history: they no longer looked at the life of Jesus.
Mt seeks a balance between emancipation and closure.
He writes his Gospel to support converts to the Faith in Christ in the communities of Galilee and Syria, accused by the Judaizers of being unfaithful to the Torah.
The evangelist clarifies that Jesus himself had been accused of serious transgressions to the Law of Moses.
The trajectory of the Jewish Scriptures is the right one, but it doesn’t have an unanimous and totally clear starting point, nor the strength in itself to reach Target.
The arrow of the Torah has been shot in the right direction, but only in the Spirit of the Beatitudes can a living assembly gain momentum to reach Communion.
The Gospel passage is concerned to emphasise: the ancient Scriptures, the historical story of Jesus, and life in the Spirit must be evaluated inseparable aspects of a single plan of salvation.
Lived in synergy, they lead to the conviviality of differences.
The God of the patriarchs makes himself present in the loving relationship of the communities, through faith in Christ, who expands his own life in their hearts.
The Living One conveys the Spirit that spurs all creativity, He overcomes unfriendly closures; He opens, and invites.
[In us, Jesus of Nazareth becomes a living Body - and the pleasure of doing manifests Him (from the soul) in Person and full Fidelity].
Handing oneself out to brothers and going to God thus becomes agile, spontaneous, rich and very personal for everyone: the Strength comes from within.
New or ancient Words, and Spirit renewing the face of the earth, are part of one Plan.
Only in the total fascination of the Risen One does our harvest come to complete life - the full objective of the Law - becoming ‘forever’.
[Wednesday 10th wk. in O.T. June 11, 2025]
Not flawed Happiness
(Mt 5:17-19)
In the early communities, some believers felt that the rules of the First Testament should no longer be considered, since we are saved by faith and not by works of the Law.
Others accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but could not tolerate the excessive freedom with which some of their brothers in the Church lived his Presence in the Spirit.
Still tied to an ideal ethnic background, they believed that ancient observances were binding.
Under the pretext of 'life in the Spirit', there were believers who were carried away by excessive fantasies (personal or group), which they considered 'inspired'.
Some, with an easy-going mentality, inclined to compromise with power, rejected the Hebrew Scriptures and considered themselves detached from history: they no longer looked at the story of Jesus.
Matthew seeks a balance between compromising emancipation and closure in observances, believing that the community experience could achieve harmony between different sensibilities.
He wrote his Gospel precisely to support converts to the Faith in Christ in the communities of Galilee and Syria, accused by their Judaizing brothers of being unfaithful to the Torah.
The evangelist makes it clear that Jesus himself had been accused of serious transgressions against the Law of Moses.
The arrow of the Torah was shot in the right direction, but only in the Spirit of the Beatitudes can a living assembly gain momentum to reach the ideal goal: Communion.
Matthew is concerned to emphasise that the ancient Scriptures, the historical events of Jesus, and life in the Spirit must be seen as inseparable aspects of a single plan of salvation.
Lived in synergy, they lead to fruitful coexistence and conviviality of differences.
The God of the patriarchs makes himself present in the loving relationship of the community, through faith in Christ, who expands his own life in our hearts.
The Living One transmits the Spirit that spurs all creativity, overcomes closed-mindedness, opens, and invites.
In short, in us, Jesus of Nazareth becomes a living Body, and the joy of doing so manifests itself (starting from the soul) in Person and in full Fidelity.
Reaching out to our brothers and sisters and going to God thus becomes easy, spontaneous, rich and very personal for everyone: strength comes from within, not from common ideas, legacies, seductions, mannerisms or external pressures.
To internalise and live the message:
Has the law written in stone remained rigid within you, or do you feel an impulse towards a new Covenant?
Do you sense within yourself an actualised and irresistible desire for good, which rediscovers everything in the Scriptures and energises the Word in the various tastes of doing?
Demolish or Accomplish
Faced with the precepts of the Law, different attitudes emerge.
On the one hand, there are those who show attachment to the material meaning of what has been established; on the other, there are those who omit or despise the norms.
Jesus offered a teaching so new and radical that it gave the impression of disregard and rejection of the Law. But in fact, rather than diverging from it, He was attentive to the spirit and profound meaning of the biblical-Jewish directives.
He did not intend to 'destroy' (v. 17) the Torah, but he certainly avoided even more being reduced to moral casuistry.
This obsession with ethics—still alive in the early communities—fragmented and eroded the meaning of fundamental choices, rendering them all superficial and without substance.
In this way, a legalistic sclerosis was produced, which easily tended to equate the codes... with God.
But for the believer, his 'obligation' is at once event, spirit of the Word, and Person: global following in those same incomparable appointments.
The faithful of the communities of Galilee and Syria were criticised by the old-fashioned Jews.
These observant Jews accused their fellow believers who had converted to the new personal, creative Faith of being transgressors and contrary to the depth of the common Tradition.
Thus, some emphasised salvation through faith alone in Christ and not through works of the law. Others did not accept the freedom that was growing precisely in those who were beginning to believe in Jesus the Messiah.
New, more radical currents already wanted to disregard his history and his Person, to get rid of him and take refuge in a generic 'avant-garde' or 'freedom of spirit' - without backbone, vicissitudes or connections.
Matthew helps us understand the conflict: the direction of the arrow shot from the Jewish Scriptures is the right one, but it does not have a clear starting point, nor the strength to reach its target.
The evangelist harmonises the tensions, emphasising that authentic observance is not formal fidelity [obedience to the 'letter'].
The fundamental spirit of fulfilment does not allow us to put the whole Christ and his trials and tribulations in brackets, perhaps remaining neutral or indifferent dreamers.
Without reductions by virtue of election, nor 'breaking down' (see17) the ancient and identified or particular ways of being - He is present in the most diverse currents of thought.
New words, ancient words, and the Spirit that renews the face of the earth are part of a single Plan.
Only in the total charm of the Risen One does our harvest come to full life - the full goal of the Law - becoming forever.
To internalise and live the message:
How do you evaluate the Pentateuch, the Psalms and the Prophets?
How do you deal with situations in harmony with the Voice of the Lord and in his Spirit?
Pure and impure: God's Law or Tradition
(Mt 15:1-2, 10-14)
The encyclical Fratelli Tutti invites us to take a forward-looking view that inspires decision and action: a new eye, filled with hope.
It "speaks to us of a reality that is rooted in the depths of the human being, regardless of the concrete circumstances and historical conditioning in which he lives. It speaks to us of a thirst, an aspiration, a longing for fulfilment, for a life lived to the full, for a measure of greatness, for that which fills the heart and lifts the spirit to great things, such as truth, goodness and beauty, justice and love. [...] Hope is bold, it knows how to look beyond personal comfort, the small securities and compensations that narrow the horizon, to open up to great ideals that make life more beautiful and dignified' (No. 55; from a Greeting to young people in Havana, September 2015).
The invisible Friend within us is the only Guide we should follow with prudence and determination.
He is the only Spiritual Master who understands what is different and does not harass it, because he does not use it (to promote himself or his own category).
The paradox of Law or Tradition belongs to v. 3 - initially understood, then excluded from the Liturgy: "Why do you also transgress the Commandment of God in the name of your Tradition?"
Habits normalise manners.
Over time, customs that are mechanically fulfilled cause us to lose the meaning of the Commandments from which they sprang.
And empty moral customs then ruin lives (vv. 4-9), annoy and exacerbate people's spirits.
The laws of purity discriminated against people and filled them with resentment.
Instead, exclusivity must not be introduced into the Eucharistic Banquet. Nor does one become part of the Community of the Lord on the basis of ambiguous selections.
The washing of hands up to the elbows was a customary practice, proclaiming the separation of the Judaizers from the pagan world: a sort of rite celebrating the separation between the (supposedly) pure and the impure.
The Eucharist, on the other hand, is accessed without arcane procedures or disciplines, or preventive X-rays.
Everyone is welcome, because it is the encounter with God that makes humanity of any cultural background alive and healthy.
For Jesus, access to the Father cannot be regulated: it depends on the person and their circumstances.
Therefore, communion with God is immediate and free, completely devoid of any prior conditions of perfection.
According to him, children can appear before the Father in any situation, at any time and in any manner: in a relationship of immediacy and freedom.
Only the poor quality of our relationships with our neighbours can contaminate women and men, nothing else.
There are no other obligations or fears that can obsess us with imperfection, inadequacy or unworthiness.
On the contrary, people lived in a climate of obsession, overwhelmed by fears about details that did not interest God.
And in the effervescence of Semitic culture, there was no lack of a current more sensitive to the social and real needs of life [linked to the theology of the prophets and psalms] that gave rise to Jesus of Nazareth.
A growing number of believers no longer agreed with the legalistic teaching of the official leaders.
In addition, the expectation of the Messiah helped them to hope for a path of 'purity' linked to quality of life and concrete relationships.
Christ opens up a completely new way to bring ordinary people closer to greater balance, to an understanding and communion with the Father, animated by creative, spousal trust.
In the realm of faith, it is life that conquers death.
According to conventional religiosity, it is the seed of death that contaminates purity.
In this prison of misguided ideas, people lived with the fear of sin and transgressions (even involuntary ones) always clinging to them.
To free the oppressed masses from the moralistic and devout ideology that subjected them to daily torment in all aspects of life, Jesus was forced to overturn the 'inside-outside' hierarchy (v. 11).
Spiritual leaders instilled the idea that impurity came from outside and was so pervasive that it contaminated even holy people [even through a simple brush against them - let alone the masses destined to an ordinary existence of deprivation].
Jesus, on the other hand, makes us feel good.
He reverses the virtues at play, well aware of the power of Life, and takes the debate about pure and impure to another level: that of depth, behaviour and relationship.Even today, Faith gives us balance and complete trust in the providential tide of real Grace, which even in times of rebirth from crisis comes to reactivate us with its unexpected impulses - far from being merely religious or sterile.
It tirelessly opens new paths to help us realise ourselves and reach God.
The Father, Son and Holy Spirit emancipate us from corporate attitudes and from always being on the defensive; they restore our self-esteem and joy of living, and make us feel at home.
In short, Christ's teaching is Good News precisely because it is the exact opposite of established conventions.
His goal is to let us live intensely, with the perception that He is within us guiding the helm. And to do so more wisely, instead of ending up badly - as in the same old mass grave [v.14; where only a few artificial positions of leadership and plagiarism are saved - meaningless to us].
For transparent coexistence
Jesus and the mania for governing: the blind man and those who are blinded
[ref. Lk 6:39-45)]
'Leave them alone! They are blind guides. But if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit' (Mt 15:14).
'How much our human family needs to learn to live together in harmony and peace, without everyone having to be the same!' (Pope Francis FT n.100).
To live in a fraternal and wise way, it is not enough to be together in twos, threes, tens or more: we could be like so many blind people who do not know how to live with themselves.
In that case, our relationships become superficial and can become empty, filled only with judgement: critical, stubborn and pedantic.
Then resentment arises within us, because we are forced into a maniacal space that does not correspond to us.
The inevitable malaise begins to decline if and when those who coordinate the group or company live their closeness with extreme modesty, with a sense of their own boundaries.
The Way of the Spirit is in fact a vocational initiative-response to the need for authentic guidance.
Authentic shepherds help only when they question themselves before others, when they do not get caught up in an exercise of empty indoctrination and moralism that exacerbates and irritates people.
Thus, the inner Friend who infallibly leads souls wants to be reflected in 'teachers' - but only to the extent that they introduce us to ourselves and to the wisdom of Scripture (rather than indulging in their own megalomania).
Commenting on Tao xxix, Master Ho-shang Kung points out (of those who want to be lord of the world):
"He wants to rule creatures through action. In my opinion, he will not succeed, because the Way of Heaven and the hearts of men are clear.
The Way of Heaven [Perfection of Harmony] detests confusion [regarding one's own nature, spontaneously expressed] and impurity [artifice], the human heart detests too many desires'.
The ancient chosen people found themselves hard-hearted, lost and without a horizon, because they were misled by religious leaders who were fiscal and down-to-earth.
Their blinding and artificial blindness was the concrete ruin of the destiny and quality of life of the entire nation.
Jesus addresses the apostles so that his assemblies of naive, humble and disoriented people do not suffer the same fate - because of a lack of righteousness on the part of those responsible for the community.
The latter, intoxicated by self-satisfaction, sometimes, instead of humanising, promoting and brightening the lives of ordinary people, willingly suffocate them with minutiae and lead them astray with trivialities.
The Lord absolutely does not want the leaders of his fraternities to allow themselves the luxury of becoming superior to others and masters of the truth. The truth of the Gospel is not something one has, but something one does.
The Master is not one who gives lessons: he accompanies his disciples and lives with them; he does not limit himself to manners.
He does not teach various subjects, etiquette, mannerisms, good manners: rather, he transmits the living and global Person of Christ - even without etiquette - without depersonalising the disciple.
In short, the Risen One is not just an example to imitate, a model that requires commitments and minutiae, a founder of an institution, of a specific ideology, or of a religion (grammar, doctrine, style and discipline).
In Jesus, we are called to identify with him - not 'by ear' or by copying. Faith itself is a multifaceted relationship.
It pushes us to reinterpret Christ in a new way; each of us in relation to our life story, new situations, events, cultural emergencies, sensibilities, and the spirit of the times.
It is the direct and personal experience of the Father as advocated by the Son. It is a conquest that overturns childish, worldly or customary measures.
It is a source and appropriation that allows us to boldly see ourselves as already redeemed, to pass from darkness to light without conditions or hammering trials.
The Lord's light is the fruit of unprecedented action and the strength of the Spirit.It is intuition of signs and Virtue that overcomes the disorientation of all those who are led astray, whether they are prisoners of opinions, pettiness, solitary selfishness or otherwise.
Unexpected energy that nevertheless comes into play thanks to the difficult situations to which it feels compelled to react; and it becomes regenerating power, unexpected life (for those already saved here and now).
Christ asks for an inventive attitude even in reaching out to one's brother - without preconceived, suffocating, morbid or cerebral patterns and codicils; without perhaps, only to welcome.
This openness is almost impossible if community ministers remain distracted or are already biased, and therefore unnecessarily rigid towards others.
In this way, they would remain pedantic, more impatient than the pagan God they still have in their bodies and minds.
All of us, freely healed, have been called by name in a special way to guide our brothers and sisters towards fundamental choices. As expert guides of the soul and of the intensity of relationships.
Not commanders and rulers with no possibility of replacement: but bread, support, nourishment, a shining sign of the Lord, a spur in favour of the lives of others.
Church leaders must be very special points of reference and cornerstones of creative, regenerating communion, from which the persistence and tolerance of a higher force of reciprocity shines through.
The eyes of the faithful in Christ remain clear and bright because they find brilliant friends who introduce them to confront and reflect not on external models (induced by opinions or intentions), but on the Word.
Conditioned by the bombardment of the 'external society' or by trivial partisan interests, spiritual leaders themselves can lose their creative discernment.
Thus, he clings to the old man, bound to vain hopes; many little and insignificant nothings - and finally becomes "blind" again.
Unfortunately, the kingdom of darkness includes not only the short-sighted, the long-sighted and the astigmatic, but above all those who see 'far' (as they say) but not the people before their eyes.
Faster and more organised than others, they take control of the situation.
For a long time, things seem pleasant in their company, but having no deep roots, it is precisely these people who ultimately ruin the fate of the weak.
They organise events or festivals instead of revitalising from within and singing the authentic song of a full life, joyful for all.
Beyond short-sightedness, attention should also be paid to 'moderation': we are not called to become good-natured, impeccable gentlemen, nor slightly more prudent and 'practical' defeatists.
All these are old failures that do not face the present and do not open up the future.
We have received the gift of the mission to build the world in the Risen One, who radiates strength and divine spark: radically new heavens and earth, even in our search.
Let us not dwell on the "specks".
In short, through grace, guidance, propulsive orientation and action, the genuine Action of vital Providence distances us from the domination of ancient superstructures ["beams" in the eye].
With such personal baggage, we can also become companions of a humanity that is no longer alienated, but enabled to breathe beyond the usual fervour... which incites trivialities.
Despite our faults, guided and blessed by the great Master and his Word in the Spirit, it will be our desire for a full and complete life that will not allow us to lose sight of our sacred Uniqueness in the world.
When the Lord Jesus was teaching the crowds, he did not fail to confirm the law which the Creator had inscribed on men’s hearts and had then formulated on the tablets of the Decalogue. “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them. For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished” (Mt 5:17-18). But Jesus showed us with a new clarity the unifying centre of the divine laws revealed on Sinai, namely love of God and love of neighbour: “To love [God] with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the strength, and to love one’s neighbour as oneself, is much more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices” (Mk 12:33). Indeed, in his life and in his Paschal Mystery Jesus brought the entire law to completion. Uniting himself with us through the gift of the Holy Spirit, he carries with us and in us the “yoke” of the law, which thereby becomes a “light burden” (Mt 11:30). In this spirit, Jesus formulated his list of the inner qualities of those who seek to live their faith deeply: Blessed are the poor in spirit, those who weep, the meek, those who hunger and thirst for justice, the merciful, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake ... (cf. Mt 5:3-12).
[Pope Benedict, homily Warsaw 26 May 2006]
Let us first place ourselves from the point of view of the direct hearers of the Sermon on the Mount, those who have heard the words of Christ. They are sons and daughters of the chosen people - people who from God - Yahweh himself - had received the "Law", had also received the "Prophets" who had repeatedly, throughout the centuries, blamed precisely the relationship maintained with that Law, the many transgressions of it. Christ also speaks of such transgressions. But even more He speaks of such a human interpretation of the Law, in which the proper meaning of good and evil, specifically intended by the Divine Lawgiver, is erased and disappears. For the law is above all a means, an indispensable means so that "righteousness may abound" (words of Matthew 5:20, in the old translation). Christ wants that righteousness to "surpass that of the scribes and Pharisees". He did not accept the interpretation that they had given down the centuries to the authentic content of the Law, insofar as they subjected that content, i.e. the design and will of the Lawgiver, to a certain extent, to the various weaknesses and limitations of the human will, resulting precisely from the threefold concupiscence. This was a casuistic interpretation, which was superimposed on the original vision of good and evil, connected with the Law of the Decalogue. If Christ tends towards the transformation of the ethos, He does so above all to recover the fundamental clarity of interpretation: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish but to fulfil" ( Mt 5:17 ). A condition of fulfilment is right understanding.
[Pope John Paul II, General Audience 13 August 1980]
But the mystery of the Trinity also speaks to us of ourselves, of our relationship with the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit (Pope Francis)
Ma il mistero della Trinità ci parla anche di noi, del nostro rapporto con il Padre, il Figlio e lo Spirito Santo (Papa Francesco)
Jesus contrasts the ancient prohibition of perjury with that of not swearing at all (Matthew 5: 33-38), and the reason that emerges quite clearly is still founded in love: one must not be incredulous or distrustful of one's neighbour when he is habitually frank and loyal, and rather one must on the one hand and on the other follow this fundamental law of speech and action: "Let your language be yes if it is yes; no if it is no. The more is from the evil one" (Mt 5:37) [John Paul II]
Gesù contrappone all’antico divieto di spergiurare, quello di non giurare affatto (Mt 5, 33-38), e la ragione che emerge abbastanza chiaramente è ancora fondata nell’amore: non si deve essere increduli o diffidenti col prossimo, quando è abitualmente schietto e leale, e piuttosto occorre da una parte e dall’altra seguire questa legge fondamentale del parlare e dell’agire: “Il vostro linguaggio sia sì, se è sì; no, se è no. Il di più viene dal maligno” (Mt 5, 37) [Giovanni Paolo II]
And one thing is the woman before Jesus, another thing is the woman after Jesus. Jesus dignifies the woman and puts her on the same level as the man because he takes that first word of the Creator, both are “God’s image and likeness”, both; not first the man and then a little lower the woman, no, both. And the man without the woman next to him - both as mother, as sister, as bride, as work partner, as friend - that man alone is not the image of God (Pope Francis)
E una cosa è la donna prima di Gesù, un’altra cosa è la donna dopo Gesù. Gesù dignifica la donna e la mette allo stesso livello dell’uomo perché prende quella prima parola del Creatore, tutti e due sono “immagine e somiglianza di Dio”, tutti e due; non prima l’uomo e poi un pochino più in basso la donna, no, tutti e due. E l’uomo senza la donna accanto – sia come mamma, come sorella, come sposa, come compagna di lavoro, come amica – quell’uomo solo non è immagine di Dio (Papa Francesco)
Only one creature has already scaled the mountain peak: the Virgin Mary. Through her union with Jesus, her righteousness was perfect: for this reason we invoke her as Speculum iustitiae. Let us entrust ourselves to her so that she may guide our steps in fidelity to Christ’s Law (Pope Benedict)
Una sola creatura è già arrivata alla cima della montagna: la Vergine Maria. Grazie all’unione con Gesù, la sua giustizia è stata perfetta: per questo la invochiamo Speculum iustitiae. Affidiamoci a lei, perché guidi anche i nostri passi nella fedeltà alla Legge di Cristo (Papa Benedetto)
Jesus showed us with a new clarity the unifying centre of the divine laws revealed on Sinai […] Indeed, in his life and in his Paschal Mystery Jesus brought the entire law to completion. Uniting himself with us through the gift of the Holy Spirit, he carries with us and in us the “yoke” of the law, which thereby becomes a “light burden” (Pope Benedict)
Gesù ci ha mostrato con una nuova chiarezza il centro unificante delle leggi divine rivelate sul Sinai […] Anzi, Gesù nella sua vita e nel suo mistero pasquale ha portato a compimento tutta la legge. Unendosi con noi mediante il dono dello Spirito Santo, porta con noi e in noi il "giogo" della legge, che così diventa un "carico leggero" (Papa Benedetto)
don Giuseppe Nespeca
Tel. 333-1329741
Disclaimer
Questo blog non rappresenta una testata giornalistica in quanto viene aggiornato senza alcuna periodicità. Non può pertanto considerarsi un prodotto editoriale ai sensi della legge N°62 del 07/03/2001.
Le immagini sono tratte da internet, ma se il loro uso violasse diritti d'autore, lo si comunichi all'autore del blog che provvederà alla loro pronta rimozione.
L'autore dichiara di non essere responsabile dei commenti lasciati nei post. Eventuali commenti dei lettori, lesivi dell'immagine o dell'onorabilità di persone terze, il cui contenuto fosse ritenuto non idoneo alla pubblicazione verranno insindacabilmente rimossi.