Camel: absurd position and transit

(Mt 19:23-30)

It is not easy to enter into the logic of the Gift and place oneself in authentic following of the Lord, in pursuit of a non-poor Happiness.

But precisely the Gospels are Ways that distinguish individual fulfilment and destiny from both expectations and obvious designs and intentions.

[Likewise natural wisdom, as e.g. reflected in the Tao Tê Ching].

Mundane expectations, common ways and thoughts indeed lock the meaning of existence into what is already represented:

"The Way that can be said, is not the eternal Way" [Tao Tê Ching, i].

Human impossibility and God's possibility (v.26): the Father transmits authentic and flourishing Life, while possessions pull on the other side - although they attract with hopes of fullness.

They normalise existence and make it stagnate.

We are accustomed to leaning on, counting on, leveraging riches... but they give opposite orders to the need for completeness of being, to the deep longing for rebirth. To the wait for the occasion, for the immediate, astonishing Gift, that will bring a significant stroke of wings.

In fact, all-encompassing Joy is not linked to the capacity to "purchase": it can only be "inherited" [gratuitously: vv.25-26.29-30].

This is the reason for the perplexity and debate between Jesus and the followers.

In short, the access of the rich into a community that lives the Faith in Christ becomes problematic (vv.23-24).

This is precisely in terms of the clarity of situations, and transparency of motives, as well as the flowering already on earth of the very Life of the Eternal [v.29 Greek text].

Here opulence distracts; it normalises the existence of even the most willing, it makes them stagnate. It gives precisely opposite orders.

Faced with the rigid and 'absurd' position of the Master, the Apostles are frightened (v.25): why not avail themselves of the help - even ambiguous - of wealthy people, who could make everything easier, more expeditious and grandiose?

Detachment from certain banners is impossible among men (v.26).

But the sphere in which God reigns is his Church, also not visible; a reality that is configured as a kind of inverted world (vv.28-30).

In fact, when God wants to realise a project, he always passes over mannerists, authorities, false (interested) friends, palaces of power and court palaces - even those within reach.

Even more than of moral credibility, it is a problem of meaning, of the roots of our choice, of vitality from below and "the renewal of all things" [v.28 Greek text]; in order to the hoped-for change and awakening.

Peter's question (v.27) highlights the discriminator of everything: the idea of exchange; retribution, typical of the archaic religious mentality.

In order to avoid conformist models ["palingenesis" v.28 Greek text] one must get out of them, and re-enter a different instinct - a mine of authentic benefit.

By introducing other content, certainly less obscure.

"What do I gain? What title do you give me? Will I get compensation for overtime?": pedestrian reciprocation is an expression of emptiness.

A mentality that drowns Love, because it annihilates the gratuitousness of gestures; it denies the sense of the Covenant.

Instead, the personal experience of the Mystery and the ability to correspond to the Call for the construction of a seed of an alternative society become the possibility of receiving the Hundred for One.

The sphere in which God reigns is his Church, even if not visible. A reality that is configured precisely as a kind of "kingdom" with inverted pyramids (vv.28-30).

In this way, the support of an intimate and apparently unreasonable conviction takes over, but one that gushes forth clearly from the springs of being.

Here is a knowledge that gushes forth from the personal soul and meets the Wisdom of every culture:

An ineffable instrument of growth is to make oneself socially insignificant.

Cultivate the concealment that guards what belongs to us.

Accepting the lack of material resources; shortage that establishes in the quality - instead of the exterior.

Here the existential 'emptiness' becomes an encounter with the vocational layers, with the pulsing of the primordial essence that characterises the Core and destiny.

Mouldable energetic expression, interspace of acute polyhedral listening (of fontal, and specific, cosmic resources of the intimate).

In his free proposal, Jesus wants to bring in the support of a reposed and apparently unreasonable conviction, but one that gushes forth clearly from the springs of being.

The founding Eros of the Calling emerges here.

Not so much the character (placid and resigned) of the believer, but a higher personal Gift: that of a discernment that is unrepeatable for each one, linked to deep nature.

To regenerate ["palingenesis" v.28] one must therefore return with greater conviction to one's own motives.

Even the wisdom of nature, of all times and latitudes, admits a clear detachment from the obvious opinions and formulas of worldly success.Primacy and glory-seeking cut off the fruitfulness of Mystery, and dampen personal Discovery. They do not open to the Extraordinary.

In fact, when God wants to realise a project, He always glosses over the surrounding situations.

It is a question of meaning, of the roots of our choice, of vitality from below and - as we said - "renewal of all things" [v.28].

A life of obligations or attachments blocks creativity, multiplies idols and artificial preoccupations; it creates a dark chamber where we do not grasp what belongs to us.

Away goes the backstage that covers our uniqueness.

The meaning of personal following is in order to the hoped-for, qualitative change and awakening: that of the One Hundred for One, strength of the weak. 

Paradoxical widening of perspective.

"The saint postpones his person, and his person is premised; he apparates his person, and his person endures. Is it not because he is devoid of interest? For this he can realise his interest' [Tao Tê Ching, vii].

According to St Ignatius [Meditation of the Two Flags], the greed of things gives birth in us to the vain honour of the world, and from it an immense pride is generated, which cuts off all possibility of internalisation.

The fruitful strength of the weak overcomes the fabulous and comfortable results expected from the support of the well-connected.

And there remains the paradoxical widening of perspective of life in the Spirit.

To internalise and live the message:

Why do you not see the hundred per cent realised?

What do you find difficult to implement in the Church because of constraints and responsibilities granted to wealthy people?

Are you also a reason for defection for those who wish to worship God in the brethren instead of shortcuts and earthly interests?